Aristegui v. Mexico: freedom of expression or offense against the judiciary?

 En amparo, conflictos supranacionales, derechos humanos, Estado

As an introduction, is important to provide the reader with a context. Enrique Peña Nieto become President of the United Mexican States after an intensive media campaign, which had many subjective implications that in a certain way can also be objectively measured: the big publicity contracts with those media companies that pushed him to power and with some of its personnel, in many cases, are public. Hence, this campaign made the people, truly or falsely, to even believe that the marriage between Angélica Rivera Hurtado (a top soap opera actress in a world-class, globally-known, Mexican soap operas’ industry) and Enrique Peña Nieto, was solely media arranged and false. Though, it is not our job to provide the reader with elements in favour or against what could be or not a hoax. Nevertheless, there is also abundant information published by the investigative journalist María del Carmen Aristegui Flores and her team, that for many people may validly amount personal public attacks, perpetrate against this marriage and family. Whereas we have no objective elements to judge if some of that information was publicly relevant beyond gossip media, or not, especially since there is no link between the family of the president and the Constitution of Mexico; altho that, as far as we know, to the day, what pretended to be a certain type of accusations, have no objective basis, like for instance a persecution, or, specifically, a condemn of a misdoing attributed to any of the members of the so-called presidential family. Still, is true they do get protection, even against their will, from the respective authorities, and that, at the minimum, they do indirectly use state-resources. The core issue is, however, that this particular case could signify the beginning of the decline, at least in regard to popularity and public perception, not just of Angélica Rivera’s career and their family’s reputation, but of Peña Nieto’s six-year term as chief of the executive power. Furthermore, being Carmen Aristegui one of the most well-known and respected Mexican journalists, with international recognition, followed by the high-impact campaign deployed for the purpose of pointing out what in her perception was a collusion between the judicial public servants, the government and the company with which she had a contract, who, in her perspective, all plotted to act against her and her team, as vengeance for the publication of an investigation concerning a property of Angélica Rivera, colloquially known as the white house; due to it, that campaign that for example generated artistic expressions and provided her and her team with awards and victimized them and martyrized their radio show, for supposedly being unfairly fired and the contract unjustly terminated; that campaign, also signified a huge and persistent hole in the legitimacy and the credibility of the Mexican judicial system, which is validly argumentable that even indirectly affected the perception of the Mexican Supreme Court, exacerbating the social classes division, making attractive the popular clamour for what appears to be a populist punishment and an attack to the judicial independence, that has as its visible mask, as the tip of the iceberg, the pretended abrupt reduction in the judicial authorities’ salaries, which, if finally occurs, may impact not just the quality, but the perception the judicature’s employees have of themselves and of the institution, and also, in such a case, the image and respect they have for their superiors, not to mention the enormous loss of the judiciary in its moral capital.

It is also important to indicate that the forthcoming reasonings and arguments, since most of the campaign’s cornerstone and legitimacy is based in a petition for supposed human rights violations; because of it, is important to mark that these elements were also sent to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in the form of an amicus curiae, with the intention of nourishing its criteria when deciding if Mexico directly violated Carmen Aristegui’s human rights, by imposing both a freedom of expression (freedom of thought and expression) and a judicial (right to a fair trial and right to judicial protection) censorships, or, otherwise, if the state, by omission, as will be seen, indeed violated, but other persons’ human rights.

We will like to complete this exordium by pointing out that the full text in Spanish language of the alluded amicus curiae can be found in this link: https://magnacartalex.com/blog/caso-aristegui-defensa-a-la-libertad-de-expresion-o-una-felonia-en-contra-la-justicia-federal-mexicana/

Being this said, it is relevant to start by explaining that Carmen Aristegui sued the company Stereorey México, Sociedad Anónima (MVS Radio), for supposedly violating her human rights, acting the mentioned company, in her perception, as an authority. She did it through an amparo, which is a Mexican legal process employed for the summary vindication of any constitutional guarantee or human right recognized by the Constitution of Mexico or by any applicable international treaty, that in the present case had the primal objective of solving a controversy between aparent acts of a supposed private authority whose functions allegedly were established in the law. The amparo, similar to the writ of habeas corpus, is also extended to any constitutional guarantee or human right recognized in Mexico, and since in the present case the ostensibly authority was being sued for acts, the effect, if it was possible to be successful, would have been, in essence, to take back in time the things as were before the contract was terminated.

After the amparo, in a quasi-automatic and regular procedure, because of its pro-humanistic nature and its rigid legal deadline, as regularly happens with similar or analogical cases; after was admitted, and notwithstanding that the federal district judge, who even co-authored a book in the subject, in the subsequent phases under his jurisdiction, went beyond of what was validly correct, thence generated for Carmen Aristegui, rights she did not have before the amparo was submitted; albeit that, MVS Radio appealed, before a federal collegiate circuit court, through what is known as a queja (complain) resource, the admission of the amparo, unanimously being solved by the three magistrates, that the amparo shall be rejected, because it was clear and beyond any doubt, that in that hypothesis, MVS Radio cannot be consider an authority that was violating human rights, since it was a dispute between private persons, regarding their contractual relationship, what was beyond the nature of the amparo, moreover since the pretended authority was indeed a private company, for which the possibility of being considered an authority, was just added in the new amparo legislation, and there was not just an absence of a precedent in the matter, but the act of terminating a contract does not imply a function established in the law, as was imperative for the amparo to be admitted, especially since as a superior court they did had the possibility to deeply enough study the matter, in order to have the clear certainty that there was no possibility for a different outcome whatsoever.

Although the federal district judge, in a substantive ultra vires, utilized the amparo as an instrument to effect acts that were contrary to the law or to legitimize factual situations outside of it, yet confusing the public opinion; regardless that through the actions under his jurisdiction he generated rights Carmen Aristegui did not have before her plaint, and in spite of the book he wrote pretending to defend those actions; howbeit all this, those rights always failed to exist, so the most relevant problem arose when she, we know not why, since the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights rarely give voice to regular people, with palpable, tangible, verifiable, much clear human rights violations against themselves; the real problem emerged thence, when she, as a colophon or climax of a disinformation campaign, in that tune, stated in front of such supranational institution, that “There was once a white house…”, implying the state censored her, not just in her freedom of thought and expression, but, because of the same motivations, in her judicial rights.

In a nutshell, the resolution of the queja resource that rejected her amparo, should have had the opposite result, hence admitting the amparo, to be possible for it to have been sustained in political, perception and/or media reasons; otherwise, as it was, the rejection is solely sustained in juridical, valid arguments, and in the law and the logic. Contrarily to it, not just the conception of the amparo, in specific of the authority for that purpose, should have been altered, but the amparo should have been admitted based in an act of authority, that failed to be not just of authority, but, as we will explain, act at all. Not to mention that this, admitting Carmen Aristegui’s amparo, will not solely be arbitrary against a private company that was not an authority and that perpetrated no act, but will also have had, for that same causes, criminal and/or administrative implications in the lives and careers of those three federal magistrates of circuit, who, despite the public opinion, truly acted in accordance with the law.

Subsequently, after the amparo was rejected for legal and valid reasons, it was abusive to start or continue a campaign, implying the state censored her freedom of thought and expression and her judicial rights, thereupon publishing books, magazine articles, news, newspaper articles, receiving international recognitions, etcetera, echoing, in order to persist getting moral capital dividends, the notion of the amparo being rejected for her and her team publishing the white house investigation, which, symmetrically to that campaign, implies the Mexican state, not to mention the loss it additionally had in its own moral capital; in that same proportion, implies that by omission Mexico violated the human rights of the involved persons, in specific those three magistrates and who supposedly colluded with them, disregarding that by acting elseways, as pointed, will have even signified criminal and/or administrative hypothesis for those judicial public servants.

Under Mexican constitutional law, the resolution that rejected the amparo, is logically valid, fair and based in the quintessential fundaments of that legal process employed for the summary vindication of any constitutional guarantee or human right recognized by the Constitution of Mexico or by any applicable international treaty, hence being undoubtable and manifest the reasons for its rejection, since it was absolutely unambiguous, because it was evident and completely clear, just by reading or observing the petition, that it resulted substantial and notoriously invalid, and that its invalidity was totally certain for the purpose of generating full belief of it in the three federal circuit magistrates, therefore, even if the amparo was admitted, notwithstanding the elements the parts could have provided, it would have been impossible to later arrive to another conclusion.

The amparo’s objective is to protect the persons from arbitrary acts perpetrated by authorities, that, through applying general norms, thus subordinating them without the need of the intervention of a judge, violate their human rights or their constitutional guarantees. In compliance with this idea, is relevant to mention that the amparo does not proceed in those hypotheses where even the state itself is acting as a particular party.

In Carmen Aristegui’s case, not to mention that the issues regarding the broadcasting and telecommunications concessions, the content and the audiences, are competence of the Federal Telecommunications Institute, and need to be solved by federal judges specialized in broadcasting and telecommunications, then being incompetent the federal district judge, who, just for that reason, it can be said he incorrectly admitted the amparo; in the case at study, the barely alluded elements, failed to exist, that is, the termination of the contract was based in substantial, not repairable, violations to it, since one of the contracting parties thought the other incorrectly used its intellectual and industrial property, not being either authorized to use some of its copy rights, brands, personnel, goods, etcetera, publicly stating false and incorrect positionings, and acting in name of it without its recognition, plus not respecting the confidentiality contained in the contract itself; all of which needed to be assessed by a judge or agreed by the parts to have full effects, thus rooted in a bilateral and horizontal relationship between private parties, not in an unilateral and vertical imperative authority act done in accordance with the law. Plus, the new corporate criteria that perhaps was consequence of this breach of the contract, was never applied to Carmen Aristegui, since the agreement with her was terminated one day before the new criteria was, in such a case, even applied, id est, before that signalized act even occur, ergo before it was, not to say if of an authority or not, but an act at all.

Consequently, the pointed out no-act, not even in the universe of the assumptions, will ever aspire to affect her legal sphere of rights, thus being false, deceitful and misleading against the judiciary, the clamour in the sense that the amparo was not admitted based in a judicial censorship or a complot or a collusion against her from part of the state, for, in any form, exercising her right to freedom of thought and expression, not being, as presumed, the judicial power subordinated and dependant of the executive; paradoxically, overlooking the media pressure and the public perception that was palpable, and that, alas, in detriment of the judicial system’s moral capital, evidently generated juicy rating dividends for the journalist; antithetically to the campaign, those three federal magistrates of circuit acted solely subordinated to the law and to the Constitutional Order.

After the case has been studied under the Mexican constitutional law, we are urged to express if there is a violation to Carmen Aristegui’s freedom of thought and expression and/or to her right to a fair trial and/or to her right to judicial protection, perpetrated by the Mexican state, as she alleged before the selective Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, when, followed by an intense campaign that included books, and articles, and diverse expressions, etcetera, at least implied her amparo was rejected because “There was once a white house…”, what allegedly was exposed by her and her team in the journalistic investigation titled La casa blanca de Peña Nieto (Peña Nieto’s white house).

It is important to start by mentioning that the existence of the white house was made public in the social-life magazine ¡Hola! México by her pretended owner, Angélica Rivera Hurtado, before Carmen Aristegui’s journalistic investigation occurred. So, to start, despite possible lawless or corruption implications, objectively, never was Peña Nieto’s white house, but, in such a case, Rivera Hurtado’s white house.

Also, is important to mention that the contract between Stereorey México, Sociedad Anónima, and María del Carmen Aristegui Flores, was legally declared as terminated by a federal district judge. And that if it was possible to ask for an amparo, alleging violations to the freedom of thought and expression, every time a media company or a broadcasting or a telecommunications concessionaire terminated a contract, then all employment, civil or business contracts, notwithstanding its nature, will be useless, denaturalizing the nature of the amparo as a constitutional legal process for protecting the human rights and the constitutional guarantees of the persons, from the arbitrary authorities’ acts, moreover if the telecommunications legislation is not ordinarily applied in such terminations. Adding that the broadcasting and telecommunications concessionaires are companies that have existence before the law, with statutes, legal representatives, shareholders, with willingness to grow, to have its corporate image, to have its specific audiences, its policies, its protocols, etcetera, being the concession and its normativity, a juridical reality, originally rooted in the Constitution of Mexico, between the companies and the state, who can limit the freedom of expression in the benefit of the general interest and of the honour of the persons and the institutions, not de facto realities, since those concessionaires are using a good whose original owner is the nation, and therefore, through it, are generating a decisive influence in all aspects of the country.

Plus, we must consider that the concession, although it does not form part of the patrimony of the concessionaire company, which acts as collaborator of the public power in relation to the authorized good or service; although it, the concession is indeed an agreement between the state and the concessionaire, that cannot be discretionally modified, with its particular normativity in pro of the development of the nation and of the state, permitting the concessionaire company to defend its legitimate interests, thus if there were basis to belief Carmen Aristegui was affecting those interests, it was justified that the contract was resigned, what was even uphold by the judicial authorities, that legally declared its termination without none of the parts needing to pay an economic compensation or other type of obligation to the other party; not existing then, limits to the contractual liberty, besides those established in the laws and in the concession itself, that is an agreement between the state and the company, not between the state and the journalists, thence being inapplicable to the particular facts, for instance, cases like Palamara Iribarne v. Chile, solved by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, because the state did not interfere in that contract termination, did not do either administrative revisions, or criminally persecuted her or her team, or censored their voices, not even legitimated in the general interest, protecting the honour of other persons and institutions.

Emerging important to reiterate that the reasons for the termination of the contract, were not for publishing the journalistic investigation La casa blanca de Peña Nieto, nor for alluding the coverage of the magazine ¡Hola! México titled Angélica Rivera la primera dama, en la intimida, nor for retransmitting or quoting the interview voluntarily given by her to that magazine; all even is logic to conclude just by the title of the journalistic investigation, an apparent visible bias, since the “white house” that “there was once”, was a property objectively attributed to Angélica Rivera Hurtado, not to Enrique Peña Nieto, what would in itself have legitimated the termination of the contract, since it was an affront to some persons’ and some institutions’ honour and/or reputation, which, since concessionaire companies like MVS Radio are using a good whose original owner is the nation, thus generating a decisive influence in all aspects of the country; thereupon, for the sake of that justifications, their concessions are not absolute or limitless, especially since it has been ruled by the highest Mexican courts, that a correct regulation and supervision of the media is necessary for the equilibrium between the people’s necessities and the responsibilities of the state like their human rights guardian.

As stated, these arguments were submitted to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in the form of an amicus curiae, with the intention of nourishing its criteria in the petition made by the journalist María del Carmen Aristegui Flores, who even, in a public audience, as is exceptional to most of the people, exposed those facts before that supranational institution; all because we think is valid to sustain that the Mexican state, as a result of being incapable to generate confidence in its executive and judicial branches, by, when possible, opposing or informing through the respective legal, public relations, press, institutional or diplomatic channels, to those who, nationally or internationally, were misinformed; due to this incapacity to explain the truth, by omission, is valid to affirm that the Mexican state is responsible for the violation of the human rights to, amongst others, the honour, to the information, to the reputation, to the name, to the prestige, to the impartiality presumption, to the decorum, to the freedom of profession, to the free enterprise, of the persons and magistrates, María Elena Rosas López, Pablo Domínguez Peregrina and Marco Antonio Bello Sánchez, as well as the case may be, of Angélica Rivera Hurtado, Enrique Peña Nieto, and the shareholders and personnel of Stereorey México, Sociedad Anónima, since, in detriment of the moral capital of the Mexican judicial system and the state, it was apparently inferred and publicized through an intensive national and international campaign, which included the publication of abundant journalistic, entertainment, social, literary, as well as legal, books and articles, what assuredly conduced and generated the false perception that, at least these persons, plotted a complot to violate Carmen Aristegui’s human rights, by obstructing her right to a fair trial and her right to judicial protection, by cause of, in any form, the exercise of her right to freedom of thought and expression, when, as is the case, an amparo with the above mentioned and the above studied characteristics, was rejected, pretending therefore, to win in the media and in the public perception and opinion, what was not possible to happen in the courts; and what, antipodally, if it did materialized, will not only have been unfair with a company that was no authority, perpetrated no act and applied no law, but, on the same basis, if occurred, could have signified administrative or criminal responsibilities for the referred federal circuit magistrates, impacting their liberties and their careers as judicial public servants.

The aforesaid got beyond any possible doubt when Carmen Aristegui in that same unusual audience, in her claim for the Mexican state to be condemned for her human rights violations, said that “… under pressure or in collusion of the political regime…”, her rights to a fair trial and to judicial protection, were violated through a “… judicial trickery…” with the purpose of “… obstructing the justice…”, all because of her, in any form, exercise of the right to freedom of thought and expression; when, as has been validly argued, her amparo was not admitted for being legally incapable of bearing fruit or producing anything, since its core plea was originated by an act of authority, which was not, nor could it even aspire to be, at least, an act, being annihilated only by what was stated in her petition, that was substantially and notoriously inadmissible.

With the foregoing elements at disposal, the question for the learned reader must be: is this case a defence to the right to freedom of thought and expression of an investigative journalist critic to the Mexican government or is it an offense against the Mexican judicial system?

Nota bene: this case is different from other case where the contract between the company MVS Radio and Carmen Aristegui was terminated, precisely for not being in the hypothesis of an act of authority perpetrated by the state, id est, by a supposed private authority whose functions allegedly were established in the law; but, a sensu contrario, therefore, an agreement amongst particulars; notwithstanding if that bargain was legally or illegally terminated, thus, if there was a compensation, indemnification, reparation or consequence whatsoever. For the same reasons, those comments for which the journalist was sued, were narrowed to that covenant between particular parties, and, thence, have no logical impact within the campaign displayed, where in a yet unusual audience before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, she stated, as hereunto has been exposed, that “… under pressure or in collusion of the political regime…”, her rights to a fair trial and to judicial protection, were violated through a “… judicial trickery…” with the purpose of “… obstructing the justice…”, all because of her, in any form, exercise of the right to freedom of thought and expression; when, au contraire, as has been validly argued, her amparo was substantially and notoriously not suitable to be admitted for being legally incapable of bearing fruit or producing anything, since its core plea was originated in no act at all (therefrom is definitive that the so-called new corporate criteria, still in the surmise that such restrictions to the agreement between the state and the concessionaire were valid (as for example a sports program becoming the news or vice versa); that criteria was never applied to her amid utilizing the broadcasting concession (indeed a settlement between the state and the company, not between the state and the journalist, for the purpose of using a good whose original owner is the nation); not being, thusly, ex hypothesi, logically possible for her human rights for freedom of thought and expression to have been restricted, less for her human rights to a fair trial and to judicial protection to have been obstructed).

Entradas destacadas
77 comentarios
  • gamefly
    Responder

    Wow that was strange. I just wrote an incredibly
    long comment but after I clicked submit my comment
    didn’t show up. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Regardless, just
    wanted to say superb blog!

  • gamefly free trial
    Responder

    With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into
    any issues of plagorism or copyright violation? My website has a lot of
    completely unique content I’ve either authored myself or
    outsourced but it seems a lot of it is popping it up
    all over the internet without my agreement. Do you know any methods to help reduce content
    from being stolen? I’d certainly appreciate it.

  • gamefly free trial
    Responder

    Remarkable! Its truly remarkable piece of writing, I have got much clear idea concerning from this paragraph.

  • gamefly
    Responder

    Do you have a spam issue on this blog; I also am a blogger,
    and I was curious about your situation; many of us have created some nice procedures and we are looking
    to trade strategies with other folks, please shoot me an e-mail if interested.

  • Responder

    What’s up to all, for the reason that I am actually keen of
    reading this website’s post to be updated daily. It consists of good information.

  • Responder

    Having read this I believed it was extremely enlightening. I appreciate you finding the time and effort
    to put this informative article together. I once again find myself
    spending a significant amount of time both reading and leaving comments.
    But so what, it was still worthwhile!

  • Responder

    Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wished to say
    that I have truly enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. After all I will
    be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again very soon!

  • g
    Responder

    Howdy! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with
    us so I came to give it a look. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers!
    Outstanding blog and great design and style.

  • g
    Responder

    It is the best time to make some plans for the future and it is
    time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I want to suggest you some
    interesting things or tips. Maybe you can write next articles referring to this article.

    I want to read more things about it!

  • gamefly free trial
    Responder

    I pay a quick visit daily some sites and information sites to read content, except this website provides
    quality based posts.

  • Responder

    Hi there! I simply would like to give you a huge thumbs up for your
    excellent info you have here on this post.
    I’ll be returning to your site for more soon.

  • gamefly free trial
    Responder

    I visited many web sites however the audio quality for audio songs current at this web site is in fact marvelous.

  • gamefly free trial
    Responder

    An intriguing discussion is definitely worth comment. I do
    think that you need to publish more about
    this topic, it may not be a taboo matter but usually folks don’t discuss such subjects.
    To the next! All the best!!

  • gamefly free trial
    Responder

    What’s up, yup this post is in fact pleasant and I have
    learned lot of things from it regarding blogging. thanks.

  • gamefly free trial
    Responder

    Wow, amazing blog layout! How long have you been blogging for?
    you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site
    is wonderful, as well as the content!

  • gamefly free trial
    Responder

    Hi everyone, it’s my first visit at this web page, and piece of writing is really fruitful
    in favor of me, keep up posting these posts.

  • gamefly free trial
    Responder

    When I initially commented I appear to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments
    are added- checkbox and now whenever a comment is added
    I get four emails with the same comment. There has to be a way you can remove me from
    that service? Appreciate it!

  • best playstation 4 games
    Responder

    I’m not that much of a internet reader to be honest but your blogs really nice, keep it up!
    I’ll go ahead and bookmark your site to come back in the future.

    All the best

  • tinyurl.com
    Responder

    No matter if some one searches for his required thing, thus he/she wishes to be available that in detail, therefore that thing is maintained over here.

  • Responder

    This post provides clear idea for the new viewers of blogging, that in fact how to do running a blog.

  • Responder

    We’re a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community.
    Your site offered us with valuable info to work
    on. You’ve done an impressive job and our whole community
    will be thankful to you.

  • tinyurl.com
    Responder

    If some one desires expert view regarding blogging afterward i propose him/her to pay a visit this webpage, Keep up the good work.

  • tinyurl.com
    Responder

    I think the admin of this site is really working hard for his web page, since
    here every information is quality based data.

  • Responder

    You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to
    be really something which I think I would never
    understand. It seems too complex and very broad for me.

    I’m looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  • tinyurl.com
    Responder

    I have been browsing online more than 4 hours today, yet
    I never found any interesting article like yours.
    It is pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content
    as you did, the internet will be a lot more useful than ever before.

  • quest bars cheap
    Responder

    Thank you for sharing your info. I really appreciate your efforts and I will
    be waiting for your next write ups thanks once again.

  • quest bars cheap
    Responder

    You’re so cool! I don’t think I’ve read anything like this before.
    So wonderful to discover someone with a few unique thoughts on this issue.
    Really.. many thanks for starting this up.
    This web site is one thing that is required on the
    web, someone with a little originality!

  • quest bars cheap
    Responder

    Excellent, what a weblog it is! This website gives valuable facts to
    us, keep it up.

  • quest bars
    Responder

    Wow, marvelous blog layout! How long have you been blogging for?

    you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site
    is magnificent, let alone the content!

  • quest bars cheap
    Responder

    Amazing! This blog looks just like my old one! It’s on a entirely different subject but it has pretty much the
    same page layout and design. Wonderful choice of colors!

  • tinyurl.com
    Responder

    Amazing blog! Do you have any helpful hints for aspiring writers?

    I’m planning to start my own blog soon but I’m a little lost on everything.
    Would you suggest starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are
    so many options out there that I’m totally confused ..
    Any ideas? Kudos!

  • Responder

    hi!,I love your writing so so much! percentage we keep up a correspondence more approximately your post on AOL?
    I require a specialist on this area to solve my problem.

    Maybe that’s you! Looking ahead to peer you.

  • Responder

    Howdy just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a
    few of the images aren’t loading correctly. I’m not sure why
    but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different web browsers and both show the same outcome.

  • http://tinyurl.com/
    Responder

    Hello, just wanted to tell you, I enjoyed this article.
    It was inspiring. Keep on posting!

  • Responder

    You actually make it seem so easy along with your
    presentation however I find this topic to be really one
    thing which I think I’d by no means understand.
    It kind of feels too complex and extremely extensive for me.
    I’m having a look ahead to your subsequent post, I’ll try
    to get the cling of it!

  • quest bars
    Responder

    I am sure this article has touched all the internet people, its really really pleasant post on building
    up new blog.

  • Responder

    Post writing is also a excitement, if you be familiar with afterward
    you can write if not it is complicated to write.

  • Responder

    Great article, exactly what I wanted to find.

  • Responder

    I all the time used to study article in news papers but now as I am a user of internet
    therefore from now I am using net for content, thanks to web.

  • Responder

    Hmm is anyone else having problems with the images on this
    blog loading? I’m trying to figure out if its
    a problem on my end or if it’s the blog. Any feed-back would
    be greatly appreciated.

  • Responder

    Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve been to your blog before but after going through some of the articles
    I realized it’s new to me. Regardless, I’m certainly happy I stumbled upon it and I’ll be bookmarking it
    and checking back frequently!

  • Responder

    Hmm is anyone else encountering problems with the pictures on this blog loading?
    I’m trying to find out if its a problem on my end
    or if it’s the blog. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

  • Responder

    I was able to find good info from your blog posts.

  • Responder

    Why viewers still use to read news papers when in this technological globe all is presented on net?

  • Responder

    Hello there, You have done a fantastic job. I will certainly digg it and personally recommend to my friends.
    I am confident they will be benefited from this site.

  • natalielise
    Responder

    Nice post. I learn something new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon everyday.
    It will always be helpful to read through content from other
    writers and use something from their web sites. pof natalielise

  • Responder

    Hello, yes this article is genuinely nice and I have learned lot of things from it on the topic
    of blogging. thanks.

  • natalielise
    Responder

    I do accept as true with all the ideas you have introduced in your post.
    They’re very convincing and will definitely work.
    Nonetheless, the posts are very short for starters. Could you please lengthen them a little from next time?
    Thank you for the post. natalielise plenty of
    fish

  • Responder

    Pretty! This was an extremely wonderful article. Thank you for providing these details.

  • natalielise
    Responder

    I’m not sure exactly why but this website is loading extremely slow for me.
    Is anyone else having this issue or is it a problem on my
    end? I’ll check back later on and see if the problem still exists.
    plenty of fish natalielise

  • natalielise
    Responder

    I do accept as true with all the ideas you’ve presented to your
    post. They are very convincing and will definitely work.
    Still, the posts are very brief for beginners.
    May just you please extend them a bit from subsequent time?

    Thank you for the post. plenty of fish natalielise

  • natalielise
    Responder

    Excellent post. I used to be checking constantly this blog and I am impressed!
    Extremely helpful information particularly the closing phase 🙂 I
    care for such information a lot. I was seeking this particular information for a
    very lengthy time. Thanks and good luck. pof natalielise

  • Responder

    It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d without a doubt donate to
    this brilliant blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for book-marking and
    adding your RSS feed to my Google account.
    I look forward to brand new updates and will talk about this blog with my Facebook group.
    Talk soon!

  • natalielise
    Responder

    Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you
    know a few of the pictures aren’t loading properly.
    I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different web browsers and both
    show the same results. pof natalielise

  • Responder

    It’s remarkable to visit this web page and reading
    the views of all colleagues concerning this article, while I am also zealous of getting knowledge.

  • smore.com
    Responder

    Thanks for one’s marvelous posting! I certainly enjoyed
    reading it, you will be a great author. I will make sure
    to bookmark your blog and will often come back in the future.
    I want to encourage you continue your great posts, have a nice holiday weekend!
    natalielise pof

  • natalielise
    Responder

    Amazing blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it
    from somewhere? A theme like yours with a few
    simple adjustements would really make my blog jump out.
    Please let me know where you got your design. With thanks plenty of fish natalielise

  • dating site
    Responder

    Asking questions are in fact good thing if you are not understanding something fully,
    except this piece of writing gives good understanding
    even.

  • dating site
    Responder

    Admiring the persistence you put into your website and detailed information you present.
    It’s great to come across a blog every once in a while
    that isn’t the same out of date rehashed material.
    Fantastic read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m including your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  • plenty of fish
    Responder

    Nice blog here! Also your website loads up fast! What host are you using?
    Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my site loaded up as fast as yours lol

  • plenty of fish
    Responder

    I savour, result in I found just what I used to be having a look for.
    You’ve ended my 4 day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day.
    Bye

  • Responder

    You ought to take part in a contest for one of the best websites on the internet.
    I’m going to highly recommend this website! natalielise plenty of fish

  • dating site
    Responder

    Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wished to mention that I have really
    enjoyed browsing your weblog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing
    in your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!

  • Responder

    Spot on with this write-up, I honestly feel
    this amazing site needs far more attention. I’ll probably
    be returning to read through more, thanks for the
    information! natalielise pof

  • plenty of fish dating site
    Responder

    Hi to every body, it’s my first pay a visit of this website; this weblog includes remarkable and actually good stuff in support of readers.

  • plenty of fish dating site
    Responder

    Your method of explaining all in this piece of writing is truly nice, every one be capable of without difficulty understand it, Thanks a lot.

  • plenty of fish dating site
    Responder

    Thanks very interesting blog!

  • plenty of fish dating site
    Responder

    I enjoy what you guys are usually up too. This sort of clever work
    and exposure! Keep up the awesome works guys I’ve you guys to blogroll.

  • descargar facebook
    Responder

    Hello, Neat post. There’s an issue together with your website in internet explorer,
    would check this? IE still is the marketplace leader and a huge element of people will miss
    your excellent writing because of this problem.

  • descargar facebook
    Responder

    I’ve been exploring for a little bit for any high
    quality articles or weblog posts in this kind of area .
    Exploring in Yahoo I finally stumbled upon this website.
    Studying this information So i’m happy to convey that I have an incredibly
    excellent uncanny feeling I discovered exactly what I needed.
    I most surely will make sure to do not forget this web site and give it a glance regularly.

  • minecraft games
    Responder

    This is my first time pay a visit at here and i am truly impressed to read all at alone place.

  • descargar facebook
    Responder

    Fastidious answer back in return of this question with real arguments and
    describing everything regarding that.

  • quest bars cheap
    Responder

    I was recommended this website via my cousin. I’m no longer
    certain whether this put up is written by means of him as nobody
    else know such specified about my problem. You’re wonderful!
    Thanks!

  • quest bars cheap
    Responder

    I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good.

    I don’t know who you are but definitely you’re going to a famous blogger
    if you are not already 😉 Cheers!

  • quest bars cheap
    Responder

    Nice post. I learn something new and challenging on sites
    I stumbleupon on a daily basis. It will always be exciting to read articles from other authors and practice something from other web sites.

  • quest bars cheap
    Responder

    Wonderful, what a web site it is! This blog provides valuable facts to
    us, keep it up.

pingbacks / trackbacks

Comente (o comenta)

Buscar